The Problem: |
 |
Find all pairs c and d of real numbers such that all roots
of the polynomials
6x 2 −24x−4c and
x 3 +cx 2 +dx−8
are nonnegative real
numbers.
Answer. There exists a single pair of values for which all
roots are nonnegative and real, namely c=−6,d=12 .
|
The solution:
When
c=−6
and
d=12
the polynomials become
6(x−2)
2

and
(x−2)
3

, whence all
five roots coincide at
x=2
and are thereby nonnegative and
real. We must now show that there are no further satisfactory pairs. Everybody's
first step was to consider the quadratic
f(x):=6x
2
−24x−4c
and show that for its roots to be
real we must have
c≥−6
: either note that its discriminant
is
24
2
−4⋅6⋅(−4c)=96(6+c)
, which is nonnegative exactly when
c≥−6
; or write
f(x)=6(x−2)
2
−4(c+6)
and note that its minimum is
−4(c+6)
at
x=2
, which is below the
x
-axis when
c≥−6
. (The requirement that the roots
of
f(x)
be nonnegative is not required;
this extra condition forces
c≤0
, but we shall soon see that the
given cubic is more restrictive.)
To analyze the cubic we have a choice of using calculus or using the
inequality of arithmetic and geometric means.
The AM-GM inequality. If
r,s
, and
t
are the roots of the cubic we
have
g(x):=x
3
+cx
2
+dx−8=(x−r)(x−s)(x−t).
Comparing coefficients yields
r+s+t=−c
and
rst=8
. To apply the AM-GM inequality we
must make use of the requirement that the roots be nonnegative; in fact, they
are positive (because their product is 8). The inequality tells us that any
three positive numbers
r,s,t
satisfy
whence
−c≥6
; that is,
c≤−6
. But we earlier determined that
c≥−6
, from which we deduce that
c=−6
. It quickly follows that
r+s+t=6=3rst
−
−
−
√
3

; therefore
r=s=t=2
and
d=12
. Consequently,
c=−6,d=12
is the only pair satisfying the
given conditions.
A calculus argument. The submissions that avoided the AM-GM
inequality all used calculus to some extent. Here is how Harrison argued.
Because the second derivative is
g
′′
(x)=6x+2c
, the cubic curve
y=g(x)=x
3
+cx
2
+dx−8
has a point of inflection at
(−1
3
c,2
27
c
3
−1
3
cd−8)
(where the second derivative is
zero). Because
g
′
(−1
3
c)=d−1
3
c
2

, the line
tangent to the curve at its inflection point has the equation
y−(2
27
c
3
−1
3
cd−8)=(d−1
3
c
2
)(x+1
3
c), or 
it therefore intersects the
y
-axis where
y=−(1
27
c
3
+8)
. Because we know that
c≥−6
, we deduce that the
y
-intercept is at most
(1
27
(−6)
3
+8)=0
. But we know that for our cubic
g(x)
to have
distinct positive
roots, it must attain its relative maximum for some value of
x
between
x=0
and the inflection point, as in the
accompanying diagram. Moreover, this maximum must lie below the line that is
tangent to the curve at its inflection point; but we know that the inflectional
tangent must have a negative slope, and we have seen that it lies below the
positive
x
-axis, thus preventing the the
curve from meeting the positive
x
-axis to the left of the inflection
point. We are therefore led to conclude that the inflectional tangent must
coincide with the
x
-axis. This forces
1
27
c
3
+8=0
and, therefore,
c=−6
. Finally, the slope of the
tangent, namely
d−1
3
c
2

, must be 0, so
that
d=12
, as claimed.

The graph of a cubic curve that has distinct positive
roots,
shown with its inflectional tangent.
math central
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기