2012년 11월 29일 목요일

현명한 질문(Three kinds of questions)

http://talk.greatbooks.org/igb/questions/

< Questions for Discussions >
The kind of question a leader asks determines the kind of discussion, and even the kind of
thinking, that will happen. We distinguish three kinds of questions.

1. Factual questions
2. Interpretive questions
3.   Eval uative questions

< 질문의 종류>

1. 사실적 질문( Factual questions ) : 책 속에서 정답을 찾을수 있는 사실에 관한 질문

2. 해석적 질문( Interpretive questions ) : 사실에 대한 이해,작가의 의도 파악 및 논리에 의한
결론을 내는 과정이 모두 필요한 질문.
3. 평가적 질문(   Eval uative questions ) : 주관적 판단을 요구하는 질문



( 1 ) About Factual Questions

A factual question has only one correct answer that can be supported with evidence.
사실적 질문은 책을 읽기만 하면 바로 대답 할수 있는 fact(사실) 에 관한 질문들,
예를들면 다음과 같은 질문에 대답 할수 있다고 해서 내용을 전부 이해했다고 할수는 없을 것이다.
What was the name of Jack's cow?
What items did Jack take from the Ogre?
How many times did Jack go up the beanstalk?

When a student can correctly answer a factual question, she knows what the text says, and
what happened and to whom. But knowing the facts is not the same as knowing what they
mean.

( 2 ) About Interpretive Questions

An interpretive question has more than one answer that can be supported with evidence from
the text.
책의 모든 내용을 다 참고하여 깊이있는 사고를 할수 있도록 도와주는 질문.

"Ah! you don't know what these beans are," said the man. "If you plant them overnight,
by morning they grow right up to the sky."
"Really?" says Jack. "You don't say so."
Does Jack believe that the beans will grow right up to the sky?

Parts of the story will support the idea that Jack does believe the man's words, but other parts suggest that he does not. "Really, you don't say so" might be sarcastic and condescending,
or it might be naive.

Simply knowing what the text says is not enough. If we want to understand Jack and this
story, we need to figure out what the text means by these words.

To answer an interpretive question, the reader must figure out what the text means by what
it says.


( 3 ) About     Eval uative Questions

An     eval uative question asks the reader to decide whether he or she agrees with the author's ideas or point of view in light of his or her own knowledge, values, and experience.
자기 경험에 비추어 주관적 판단을 요구하는 질문,다양한 대답이 나올수 있다.
Is it necessary to take risks -- as Jack does -- in order to grow up?

Like an interpretive question, this one can be validly answered in more than one way.
Exploring answers to it, however, will lead not to the text as much as it will to the values,
beliefs and experience of the reader.

This sort of exploration of one's own point of view and how it compares to that of the story is most worthwhile and valuable only after carefully interpreting. Only after a reader comes to an understanding of why Jack takes the risks he does and what the story is trying to say about
that risk-taking will he or she be able to profitably explore  eval uative questions.

댓글 없음: