Mathematician: I’m glad you asked. The theory of evolution
with natural selection sheds some light on the question of why humans exist,
which in turn relates to the meaning of life. First of all, let me get this out
of the way: while evolution is still called a “theory”, it has a tremendous
amount of evidence in support of it (including gradual transitions in the fossil
record, radiocarbon dating, DNA analysis, laboratory experiments, etc.) and, as
biologist Richard Dawkins is known to say, it is only a theory in the sense that
the “theory of gravity” is a theory. From a scientists perspective, evolution is
a fact. But what does that have to do with the meaning of life? Well, evolution
tells us that human beings share a common ancestor with apes, not to mention
with pigs, dogs, cats, rats, plants, and bacteria. If historically the
conditions on earth had been very slightly different than they were, the best
traits for survival would have been different also, and therefore we would
expect that some other species besides humans (possibly with intelligence as
great as ours) would now dominate this planet. Hence, evolution tells us that
humans have the capacities that they do now simply because those capacities
helped our ancestors survive long enough to have children, or made them more
effective at finding mates.
I believe most people will agree that “What is the meaning of life?” is a
question that is meaningless when it is applied to the lives of rodents,
insects, or bacteria. As we are simply evolutionary offshoots of these
creatures, what makes us think that this question will have any more
significance when applied to us? The primary characteristic that differentiates
us from these other creatures is our powerful brains that have incredible
capacity for abstract though (including the ability to consider questions like
“what is the meaning of life?”). Each of us exists today because our ancestors
managed to survive. Their survival occurred both because they were well adapted
to their environment, and because they got very, very lucky. Our existence then
is, in some sense, a happy accident, and lacks the deep cosmic significance that
questions like “what is the meaning of life?” presuppose. Fortunately, however,
our brains are very adept at discovering meaning in all sorts of places. Life
does not require an all encompassing, universal meaning or purpose in order for
us to find that our own lives are meaningful, and that is a truly wonderful
thing! We can feel totally fulfilled despite being little more than happy
accidents of evolution. Of course, “meaning” is a very real and important
emotion, but that does not make it an objective property of things. Fortunately,
there is no reason to fret over life itself having no ultimate purpose. We
ourselves can find something that fills us with a sense of purpose, which for
practical purposes is just as good.
Physicist: Every now and again a question comes along that
implies more than it asks. Questions like: “What’s that blue thing?”, or “Who
ate this?”. If there’s nothing blue or eaten around, then these questions don’t
make sense. The same is true of the classic: “What is the meaning of
life?”.
Ask a Mathematician / Ask a
Physicist
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기