Fabrice Coffrini/Agence
France-Presse — Getty Images
Peter Higgs, right, and François Englert
at a conference in Switzerland on July 4, 2012.
The “God particle” became the Prize
particle on Tuesday.
Two theoretical physicists who suggested
that an invisible ocean of energy suffusing space is responsible for the mass
and diversity of the particles in the universe won the Nobel Prize in Physics on
Tuesday morning. They are Peter Higgs, 84, of the University of Edinburgh in
Scotland, and François Englert, 80, of the University Libre de Bruxelles in
Belgium.
The theory, elucidated in 1964, sent physicists on a
generation-long search for a telltale particle known as the Higgs boson, or the
God particle. The chase culminated in July 2012 with the discovery of the Higgs boson at the Large
Hadron Collider at CERN, in Switzerland.
Dr. Higgs and Dr. Englert will split a prize of $1.2
million, to be awarded in Stockholm on Dec. 10.
The Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences said the prize
was “for the discovery of the mechanism that contributes to understanding the
origin of the mass of subatomic particles.”
“You may imagine that this is not unpleasant,” Dr.
Englert said in an early morning news conference.
As of the time of the news conference, the academy
still had not been able to reach Dr. Higgs, the J.D. Salinger of physics, who
was standing by his word to be unavailable.
The prize had been expected ever since physicists
working at the Large Hadron Collider announced on July 4, 2012 that they had
discovered a particle matching the description of the Higgs, setting off
headlines and sending Champagne fountains flowing around the world. Thousands of particle
physicists worked on the project, and
for many of them the Nobel is a crowning validation.
“I’m thrilled that this year’s Nobel Prize has gone to
particle physics,” Rolf Heuer, CERN’s director general, said in a statement.
But it came with a dose of disappointment for some.
The notion of this energy ocean, now known as the Higgs field, arose in three
papers published independently in 1964.
One was by Dr. Higgs. Another was by Dr. Englert and
his colleague Robert Brout, who died in 2011. The third paper was by Tom Kibble
of Imperial College, London; Carl Hagen of the University of Rochester; Gerald
Guralnik of Brown University. It came last and its authors have struggled to get
recognition. Last week Dr. Hagen allowed that he had little expectations for
today, and he was right.
“The Swedes followed the script (and their rule book)
— which from my perspective does not make for a happy outcome,” Dr. Hagen said
in an e-mail Tuesday morning.
The Nobel Prize is not awarded posthumously, and
traditionally no more than three people have been permitted to share a single
prize.
R. Sekhar Chivukula, a Michigan State professor who
chaired a committee that awarded the American Physical Society’s prestigious
Sakurai prize to all six of the theorists in 2010, called the failure by the
Nobel committee to recognize the work of Drs. Kibble, Hagen and Guralnik “a
significant oversight.”
Steven Weinberg, of the
University of Texas, Austin, who won a Nobel Prize in 1979 by making the Higgs
boson the centerpiece of a theory that united two of the basic forces of nature
(electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force), said he was enthusiastic about
the award, saying the citation had gotten things exactly right, but added “I
think it’s a pity,” that Drs. Guralnik, Hagen and Kibble had not been
represented.
The Higgs was the last missing ingredient of that
theory, a suite of equations that has ruled particle physics for the last half
century, explaining everything from the smell of a rose to the ping when your
computer boots up. According to this model, the universe brims with energy that
acts like a cosmic molasses, imbuing the particles that move through it with
mass, the way a bill moving through Congress attracts riders and amendments,
becoming more and more ponderous and controversial.
Without the Higgs field, all elementary particles
would be massless and would zip around at the speed of light. There would be no
atoms and no us.

댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기